Orange Envelopes | Small Business Optimized Marketing > By Design

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Attention

Subscribe to Articles

logo

Recent Posts

  • Congratulations! You’re the winner of a list of exclusions.
  • Who Needs a Gun When You Can Click a Mouse? Blog theft made easy and guilt free.
  • Don’t Blow The Innovation Handoff
  • How to Deliver Memorable Customer Service via Twitter: Be Human
  • That Great Idea of Yours Isn’t Innovation
Twitter Counter

Twitter

  • sad, but true RT @iowahawkblog: "Go to college" is to education what "put things in your mouth" is to cuisine. 8 hours ago
  • there's a battle being waged to be the next screen in your life. will the unsung vending machine win? http://t.co/IDyf9Dhn 2012/05/17
  • any http://t.co/7xipEPQ5 geniuses in the CLE area? give me a shout 2012/05/16
  • looking for Photoshop training in CLE. Can anyone recommend a place/person? 2012/05/16
Social Media Links

Blogroll

  • aClearEye
  • Altitude Branding
  • Bloghound
  • Chris Brogan
  • Cleveland SMC
  • Copyblogger
  • Gaping Void
  • Orange Envelopes
  • Seth Godin
  • The Brandbuilder Blog
  • The Job Shopper
  • The Job Shopper
  • The Orange-Envelopes Alltop Page

BlueHost

Visit MyAlltop Page

What Would @Stalin Tweet?

Author: John Heaney Category: Branding, Design, Marketing, Personal Branding, Social Media, Twitter Tags: Branding, john heaney, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter

Monday
Jul 6, 2009

stalin helm copyImagine if all the social media tools and channels that we rely upon today were available back in the 1930′s while Stalin extended his dominion over the Soviet empire.

Eager to propagandize stories documenting the unrivaled success of his agricultural collectivization and industrial expansion, Stalin would have turned to his battalions of Party apparatchiks and impelled them to repeatedly Tweet the wonders of Sovietization. And like the advertising agencies slammed in today’s AdAge article, Stalin’s Soviet Ministry of Communications Enterprises and Functions (Digital Formulations) would have been an abject failure.

Mimicking Stalin’s command and control methodology, today’s behemoth advertising agencies are simply attempting to appropriate the assorted social media platforms as yet another ancillary broadcast channel where they can propagandize their uniformly one-way message.

Pursuing social media tactics that would have made the commissars proud, these ad agencies lack a few significant components that differentiate successful SM campaigns, including:

  1. Transparency – the best SM programs enlist senior executives to participate in the conversations. They may not tweet with the regularity of their employees, but their participation sends a distinct message that dialogue with their clients is important for everyone in the company.
    The laggards outsource their SM chatter to ad agencies or other third parties, clearly communicating to their own staff and their clients (who will inevitably discover their dereliction) that social media is employed simply as another tactic, not as part of any strategic communication or brand building plan.
  2. Authenticity – Twitter posts from named executives and employees resonate with clients and prospects. When the CEO pronounces his commitment to customer service or product quality in a global, open forum, that proclamation has significant meaning and impact. It’s not a nameless, faceless corporate voice, but Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh or Richard at Dell making these statements. Real people articulating real promises in their real voices.
  3. Conversation – Social media is about dialogue, not broadcasting. Relationships aren’t built or strengthened when you yell your message at an individual over and over. He resents it and you derive no value unless your hectoring somehow compells him to purchase your product. Not likely. SM is all about generating conversations. Getting to know others online, building relationships, engendering trust and maybe, just maybe, finding a way to transact business together.
  4. Longevity – Mars, Inc, the candy company that produces Skittles, followed the advice of their ad agency to make a highly visible commitment to convert Skittles’ entire online presence to Twitter. It turned out to be a huge failure. One of the biggest mistakes was for Skittles to cannonball directly into the Twitter pool and expect an enthusiastic welcome. Although their splash was huge, their welcome was not. Skittles had made no effort to create an online community, to engage with their customers or to provide any type of customer support or interaction. The strongest SM participants are in for the long haul. Their employees establish online reputations, contribute to discussions, interact freely with all participants and integrate their SM activities with their daily routines.
  5. Community – Ad agency employees need a huge banner strung across their  ergonomically pure, ecologically sustainable Herman Miller outfitted cubicles reading: It’s Not About You. Self interest may be the single defining quotient of Twitter accounts that are managed by ad agencies. They formulate dozens of clever ways to announce their new product, to roll out a contest or slick giveaway and to link to their own promotional websites. What they don’t engage in is dialogue of any kind.
[del.icio.us] [Facebook] [LinkedIn] [Twitter]

Comments

Avatar

Susie Sharp

July 7th, 2009 at 5:54 am

John, as usual, another spot-on article. You manage to say volumes in one page. Brevity is the soul of wit, my friend!

[Reply]


Click here to cancel reply.

Comment Form

3 Quick Steps to Devastate Your Clever iPhone App
How to Get 500,000 People to Hate Your Company

Copyright 2012 Orange Envelopes | Small Business Optimized Marketing > By Design - All Rights reserved.

Wordpress theme by: WPUnlimited