<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Blowback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:07:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Heaney</title>
		<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>John Heaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/?p=676#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>So much of a company&#039;s facility with social media seems to be a reflection of their corporate culture. Compared to Southwest, United is a sclerotic, hidebound bureaucracy whose instinctive response to a public complaint revolves around carefully crafted statements from a centrally managed corporate communications department, not an immediate, genuine response from their front line employees. It&#039;s simply not in their corporate DNA to respond creatively. Besides, their legal department would never allow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much of a company&#8217;s facility with social media seems to be a reflection of their corporate culture. Compared to Southwest, United is a sclerotic, hidebound bureaucracy whose instinctive response to a public complaint revolves around carefully crafted statements from a centrally managed corporate communications department, not an immediate, genuine response from their front line employees. It&#8217;s simply not in their corporate DNA to respond creatively. Besides, their legal department would never allow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Cool</title>
		<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/?p=676#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>John, great example. They can&#039;t just pay lip service to the process, and they can no longer assume that their audience is getting their primary messages from mainstream media channels. I can go days without turning on a television or reading a paper. Sometimes I hear about news on Twitter before anywhere else. 

As individuals we may be small voices, but connected as we are through social media we have the power of their top corporate clients. When added together we can also produce equivalent revenue, which Southwest seems to have figured out as well. 

Aside from the obvious PR failure of not responding appropriately, quickly or effectively, they also failed at seeing the opportunity to turn these lemons into some yummy lemonade. A positive cross-channel response from them could have gotten them all sorts of brownie points at a time when the whole world was looking at them, ears open ready to hear what they had to say. It was like being given 30 minutes of airtime at the Superbowl and not using it because they felt sheepish. And as someone who has had a United Frequent Flyer card for years and generally been happy with the service, I feel like a customer who has been let down. It makes me wonder why something I&#039;ve generally liked seems to have wandered off track. That&#039;s not a way to build loyalty. Granted I&#039;m not jetting about that often, but others are. This once small customer service failure turned into a major brand management fiasco through a simple communications failure that could easily have been avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, great example. They can&#8217;t just pay lip service to the process, and they can no longer assume that their audience is getting their primary messages from mainstream media channels. I can go days without turning on a television or reading a paper. Sometimes I hear about news on Twitter before anywhere else. </p>
<p>As individuals we may be small voices, but connected as we are through social media we have the power of their top corporate clients. When added together we can also produce equivalent revenue, which Southwest seems to have figured out as well. </p>
<p>Aside from the obvious PR failure of not responding appropriately, quickly or effectively, they also failed at seeing the opportunity to turn these lemons into some yummy lemonade. A positive cross-channel response from them could have gotten them all sorts of brownie points at a time when the whole world was looking at them, ears open ready to hear what they had to say. It was like being given 30 minutes of airtime at the Superbowl and not using it because they felt sheepish. And as someone who has had a United Frequent Flyer card for years and generally been happy with the service, I feel like a customer who has been let down. It makes me wonder why something I&#8217;ve generally liked seems to have wandered off track. That&#8217;s not a way to build loyalty. Granted I&#8217;m not jetting about that often, but others are. This once small customer service failure turned into a major brand management fiasco through a simple communications failure that could easily have been avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Heaney</title>
		<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Heaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/?p=676#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>Heidi, it appears that most of the legacy Fortune 500 type companies are still under the illusion that they can control everything surrounding their message. After all, they&#039;re the ones with the most cash. Not only are they missing the conversations going on whether or not they&#039;re in the room, but they&#039;re failing to respond when their brand is taking incoming fire. United&#039;s response to Dave Carroll was emblematic of these lumbering behemoths. A single tweet from the official United communications flack stating that they were trying to reach Dave and a second tweet saying they were offering to compensate him &lt;del datetime=&quot;2010-01-15T19:11:50+00:00&quot;&gt;to shut him up&lt;/del&gt; to take care of him. No blog response. No YouTube response. No genuine apology from a real person with some real responsibility. Just a sterile corporate release. Contrast their response with the way Southwest actually engages their passengers on the assorted SM platforms. Night and day. Now, guess which airline is profitable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, it appears that most of the legacy Fortune 500 type companies are still under the illusion that they can control everything surrounding their message. After all, they&#8217;re the ones with the most cash. Not only are they missing the conversations going on whether or not they&#8217;re in the room, but they&#8217;re failing to respond when their brand is taking incoming fire. United&#8217;s response to Dave Carroll was emblematic of these lumbering behemoths. A single tweet from the official United communications flack stating that they were trying to reach Dave and a second tweet saying they were offering to compensate him <del datetime="2010-01-15T19:11:50+00:00">to shut him up</del> to take care of him. No blog response. No YouTube response. No genuine apology from a real person with some real responsibility. Just a sterile corporate release. Contrast their response with the way Southwest actually engages their passengers on the assorted SM platforms. Night and day. Now, guess which airline is profitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Cool</title>
		<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/?p=676#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>John, this is a great way to phrase the concept. The companies aren&#039;t the only ones with media access. Now all of us are publishers, video producers and whatever else is necessary to bring our message to the people. This post also brought me back to our lunch last summer when you inspired me to write, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heidicool.com/blog/2009/08/21/take-control-of-your-social-media-presence-before-someone-does-it-for-you/&quot;&gt;Take control of your social media presence before someone does it for you.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; That message remains the same, since the companies can&#039;t control the message they must accept it, start listening to the messages that are out there, become part of the conversation, and learn from it all. If they take what they learn and act on it to improve themselves, then the messages will improve as well. In 2010 that&#039;s what will give them control - listening and responding to customers. Of course if you think about it, that&#039;s how it&#039;s always been. Happy and unhappy customers have always told their friends about their experiences. It&#039;s just that now they broadcast them for everyone to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, this is a great way to phrase the concept. The companies aren&#8217;t the only ones with media access. Now all of us are publishers, video producers and whatever else is necessary to bring our message to the people. This post also brought me back to our lunch last summer when you inspired me to write, &#8220;<a href="http://www.heidicool.com/blog/2009/08/21/take-control-of-your-social-media-presence-before-someone-does-it-for-you/">Take control of your social media presence before someone does it for you.</a>&#8221; That message remains the same, since the companies can&#8217;t control the message they must accept it, start listening to the messages that are out there, become part of the conversation, and learn from it all. If they take what they learn and act on it to improve themselves, then the messages will improve as well. In 2010 that&#8217;s what will give them control &#8211; listening and responding to customers. Of course if you think about it, that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s always been. Happy and unhappy customers have always told their friends about their experiences. It&#8217;s just that now they broadcast them for everyone to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erbower (Eric Bower)</title>
		<link>http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>erbower (Eric Bower)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 04:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/?p=676#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Social Media Blowback http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/ --&gt;great read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Media Blowback <a href="http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/">http://orange-envelopes.com/blog/2010/01/15/social-media-blowback/</a> &#8211;>great read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
